同济大学人文学院;
人工智能伦理审查是防范人工智能伦理风险的重要手段,需要引起我们的高度重视。目前学术界与科技企业已经开始关注并实施伦理审查,但具体规范与标准尚处于探索阶段。人工智能科研人员的自我伦理审查、同行审查与机构审查均存在不少挑战,影响与制约着人工智能伦理审查的顺利开展及其功能的正常发挥。我们应该针对人工智能伦理审查的核心问题,通过强化自我审查、完善同行审查与推动机构审查等多种途径,建构较为完善的人工智能伦理审查体系,推动其发挥应用的积极作用,进而促进人工智能健康发展。
| 2,198 | 4 | 83 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
[1] SRIKUMAR M, FINLAY R, ABUHAMAD G, et al.Advancing Ethics Review Practices in AI Research[J].Nature Machine Intelligence, 2022, 4(12):1061-1064.
[2] MOON M. The History and Role of Institutional Review Boards[J]. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 2009, 11(4):311-321.
[3]周吉银,李红英,杨阳.人工智能医疗器械的伦理审查要点[J].医学与哲学,2020(6):35-39.
[4]吉萍,郭锐,许卫,等.医疗人工智能产品研发的伦理审查与法律考量[J].医学与哲学,2020(5):15-18.
[5] BIRHANE A, KALLURI P, CARD D, et al. The values encoded in machine learning research[C]//Isbell C. et al.(eds.). FAccT, 22. New York:ACM, 2022:173-184.
[6] Partnership on AI. Managing the Risks of AI Research[EB/OL].(2021-05-06)[2023-09-24]. https://partnershiponai. org/paper/responsible-publication-recom mendations/.
[7] ASHURST C, HINE E, SEDILLE P, et al. AI ethics statements[C]//Isbell C. et al.(eds.). FAccT, 22.New York:ACM, 2022:2047-2056.
[8] NANAYAKKARA P, HULLMAN J, DIAKOPOULOS N.Unpacking the expressed consequences of AI research in broader impact statements[C]//Fourcade M. et al(eds). AIES, 21. New York:ACM, 2021:795-806.
[9] SPAAPEN J, DROOGE L. Introducing productive interactions in social impact assessment[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3):211-218.
[10] TRETKOFF E. NSF’ s “broader impacts” criterion gets mixed reviews[EB/OL].(2007-06-01)[2023-09-24]. https://www. aps. org/publications/apsnews/200706/nsf. cfm.
[11] KEITH-SPIEGEL P, KOOCHER G, TABACHNICK B.What Scientists Want from Their Research Ethics Committee[J]. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2006, 1(1):67-82.
[12] BURNETT S, FEAMSTER N. Encore:Lightweight Measurement of Web Censorship with Cross-Origin Requests[C]//UHLIG S, et al(eds.). SIGCOMM’15. New York:ACM, 2015:653-667.
[13] BOZEMAN B, BOARDMAN C. Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives:Passing the Buck on Science and Social Impacts[J]. Social Epistemology, 2009, 23(3-4):183-198.
[14]李建军,王添.科研机构伦理审查机制设置的历史动因及现实运行中的问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2022(3):51-57.
[15]孟令宇,王迎春.探索人工智能伦理审查新范式[J].科学与社会,2023(4):97-113.
[16] BERNSTEIN M, LEVI M, MAGNUS D, et al. Ethics and society review:Ethics reflection as a precondition to research funding[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(52):1-8.
[17]迪格纳姆.负责任的人工智能何以可能?[M].谢蓉蓉,陈明晰,程国建,译.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2023:84.
[18] LIN H, BALCAN M, HADSELL R, et al. What we learned from NeurIPS 2020 reviewing process[EB/OL].(2020-11-01)[2023-09-24]. https://neuripsconf.medium. com/what-we-learned-from-neurips-2020-reviewing-process-e24549eea38f.
[19] HECHT B, WILCOX L, BIGHAM J, et al. It’s time to do something:Mitigating the negative impacts of computing through a change to the peer review process[EB/OL].(2021-12-17)[2023-09-24]. https://arxiv. org/abs/2112. 09544.
[20] KNIGHT S, SHIBANI A, VINCENT M. Ethical AI governance:Mapping a research ecosystem[J]. AI and Ethics, 2024.
[21]邱仁宗,翟晓梅.在国际背景下我国伦理审查的能力建设:理念和实践[J].中国医学伦理学,2008(2):3-5.
基本信息:
DOI：10.19883/j.1009-9034.2024.0124
中图分类号:B82-057;TP18
引用信息:
[1]杜严勇.人工智能伦理审查:现状、挑战与出路[J].东华大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(02):32-39.DOI:10.19883/j.1009-9034.2024.0124.
基金信息:
2020年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“人工智能伦理风险防范研究”(项目编号:20&ZD041)